Archive for the 'music' Category

The broken music industry. Why a free anti-piracy DVD for schools won’t work.

This is a website set up by MIPI “an organisation that provides investigative and intellectual property rights enforcement” along with the support of the major music labels & local industry body ARIA. It’s basically a video based on the old shtick where the artists all line up to cry poor about how music piracy is hurting them.

Included are Aussie acts like The Veronicas, who made a $AU 1.7 million profit last year & Human Nature with $AU 1.9 million for their trouble. These numbers come via the BRW Top 50 Entertainers list (subscription needed).

Even more mind-melting is the fact that this will be available on DVD free to high schools and available as a BitTorrent download! (BitTorrent is one place where you can access pirated music on the net.) From The Age newspaper article:

“The documentary is not yet part of a structured anti-piracy program in schools, but Heindl said it was formatted to fit neatly into existing units, such as the “Music for Free?” English unit created this year by the Commonwealth Department of Education, which examines the ethics of file sharing.”

I’m amazed that the artists are willing to line themselves up to peddle this tired crap - but then again if you’ve ever listened to some of these records, you’d know that many of these artists have made a career from recording their toilet activities and setting it to a dope beat with the help of a hot producer. To understand why this is just so much rubbish and how a free DVD of some confused artists won’t do anything to help, come with me now as we zoom out to take a bigger look at what is going on.

Music happened before there was an industry and it will happen after. Music is a timeless human expression that changes and occurs constantly. The ‘industry’ is new to music in this timescale and has sought to exploit a gap between artist and (a new) audience opened by technology. It did/does this in two ways:

Firstly, technology emerged (c.1888) that meant that a recording could be made of a musical performance. New technology is always expensive and subsequently this meant that very few people had the opportunity to record. Over time, many myths have been and continue to be built up about the recording process - most of them bogus. Most music business people have little understanding of this technology, so subsequently they subscribe to these myths (ie. an expensive recording studio is a better recording studio). These myths are handy when artists take them on, as require the continued participation of the music business to finance something that the artist can rarely do themselves.

Secondly, yet more technologies allowed these recordings to be reproduced, distributed and sold to many more people than before. Things like vinyl presses, trucks & trains, radio stations and so on were expensive and the music industry has paid for and subsequently controlled many aspects of the technology/money gap between artist and audience. The music industry belives that it created, paid for and therefore owns this audience - even if they used artists and their work as the front to do so. It’s important to note here that while they may have created an audience they did not create the audience. The audience is a cultural phenomenon. In music, an audience starts with the individual who creates a piece and goes out into the world.

As technology has moved on and closed this gap of its own volition, the music industry failed to see what was happening and is now broken. If some people did see this happening, there was little or nothing that could be done to stop it. Recording technology is cheap and prolific and is a massive industry in its own right. With more access to information (largely via the internet) recording myths are being debunked or becoming so outrageous that they are irrelevant. The recording industry lost this aspect of control about 20 years ago and was the beginning of the end for it. The internet has subsequently filled the distribution, marketing and sales gap once controlled by a few large companies. Without a gap to exploit, there can be and will be no music industry in the centrally controlled mass-market fashion we’ve become accustomed to.

This means that someday soon The Veronicas will be out there in the big wide world with just themselves, their music, some recording gear and a computer - just like the majority of people who make music today. All this film shows is a sad display of artists coming to terms with the fact that the industry they chose to be a part of is broken and without it, making a buck out of music will continue to require them to work hard with most likely, less reward.

So now we have some perspective - here’s a quick list of items for consideration for the crew of the SS. Australian Music Biz as their ship disappears under the waves, never to be see again:

  • Music will still get made, sold and enjoyed even if ARIA and all the major labels collapsed overnight.

  • The day after this happens the members of general public who have yet to ween themselves off commercial radio will realize that there is more music out there than ever before covering more styles, sounds, moods and ideas than you’ll ever have time for.
  • With their feed tube removed, radio stations may have to return to employing DJ’s who know & care about music. This would also mean that it will be easier for more bands to have access to more ears.
  • Music will be purchased directly (or more directly) from the artists, so while they may not sell as much, they’ll make the same, or maybe more money - as this article by Steve Albini demonstrates and also as recent releases by Radiohead and Nine Inch Nails indicate.
  • Performing will return as essential to any music career. Industry-made studio-built bands will get less attention without a show or a publicity machine.
  • Less cash and public prominence will lower the risk of artists developing fevered egos and becoming culturally disconnected and irrelevant. Bono and Sting will return to their true place in the world as “a couple of guys from those two bands”.
  • With less money recording will be stripped back to it’s essentials (a good recording of a good performance) as no one will be able to afford spending excessive time in the studio polishing turds.

Please big music industry, go someplace quiet and die to let the rest of us get on with making music for each other. We don’t need you anymore and we’re sorry you didn’t realise that you couldn’t own music. It’s a shame to have to watch you pass away without dignity - but this is the fate suffered by many a cheat. It’s not nice to think about all the artists you exploited and the ill fate that many suffered but we’ll recycle what’s left of you (and your market) to make something new. We promise to think of you when we play our copies Back In Black that we downloaded on our computers and remember the times when people “made records like that”.

Using a web based app plus Live to make ambient music

This was going to start as a simple post about a neat little online music application that was sent to me by my brother-in-law’s wife but subsequently became something else.

This is the little app named Pianolina. Sitting on the Grotrian Pianos web site, I guess it’s a promotional tool. It’s a neat little generative music device that lets you play around with some piano sounds and come up with some neat stuff with not much effort. It’s the kind of thing you’d spend 5 minutes mucking around with and then move on to the next neat yet useless web thingy. It struck me however that using this little web could be used as a source for generating some ambient music using Ableton Live.

What I liked about this little piano music machine was that it had a really nice blend of both random and controlled elements which is good for generating some spontaneous and novel material. Kinda dull on its own after a while, but more interesting when processed and shaped. The screenshot above is of the set-up I used to make the piece below. The squares here were drifting around very slowly.

Here’s the result of my experiment, below. It took about an hour and a half to put together. (MP3/192k/11 meg)

Here is the Ableton Live project that I made to create this. Made with Live 7.0.3 using only stock effects plug-ins. It should run fine on most Intel-Macs.

I also used a neat little piece of software from Cycling 74 called SoundFlower. It’s a basic little utility that allows you to send audio between applications on a Mac. Very handy. In this case I was feeding the output of Firefox to Ableton Live which then processed the Grotrian Pianos flash-thingy’s output.

Why records DO all sound the same | Word Magazine

Another great article today from Word Magazine on the state of making records and all the issues involved, from sound quality to making hits. This article was written by Tom Whitwell who also maintains the awesome Music Thing blog.

Why records DO all sound the same | Word Magazine

“Why does most music sound the same these days? Because record companies are scared, they don’t want to take risks, and they’re doing the best they can to generate mainstream radio hits. That is their job, after all. And as the skies continue to darken over the poor benighted business of selling music, labels are going to cling to what they know more fiercely than ever.”

(Via Music Thing.)

Picture of Jack Joseph Puig in his studio.

Free RADIOHEAD remix album

Oakland DJ Amplive did a bunch of re-mixes in tribute to Radiohead’s “In Rainbows” album.
He put them up on the net for free.
He received a cease and desist order from Warner Bros. lawyers.
He put a video on YouTube explaining himself and asking to meet the band and play them the re-mixes.
He did.
Amplive’s remix album of In Rainbows is once again available for free download, this time with the band’s blessing. Get the Rainydayz remix album here.

Great work Radiohead - keep it up.

Amazing endoscopy footage of voice singing.

This amazing stuff popped up on MetaFilter - footage from Dr. Christopher Chang, an E.N.T. specialist who deals with various issues associated with the voice.

Start by having a look at this movie of a woman singing glissandi from low to high then high to low. If you want to see more footage, especially of people who have all sorts of issues with their voice - check out this page.

What amazed me is watching how the vocal membranes themselves change with pitch and how athletic the entire vocal mechanism is. Now all we need is to hook up David Lee Roth to the endoscope and get him to give ‘Running With The Devil’ another shot.

As a side note - I used Skitch to get the screen grab you can see above. Total genius - this app rocks and makes stuff like grabbing an image for things like this a total cakewalk!

David Lee Roth is on the mic

A bunch of people blogged this last week, but I thought that it could not go without being noted here. This is the raw, and I’d imagine ‘comped vocal* of Diamond David Lee Roth’s vocal take for ‘Running With The Devil’ from Van Halen’s first self-titled LP.

I don’t believe there is any fancy processing on this vocal, so all the overtones you can hear here are made by DLR himself.

It’s totally freakin’ awesome! I really need to go back and listen to this record again…

.

Also, while we’re on the subject of Van Halen - you probably need to see Yacht Rock #9 as well.

via Chunklet

* ‘comped - short for compiled. This is audio nerd talk for when you take a bunch of recording takes and edit them together to make one final track to be used for mixing.

The Loudness War & mixing for MP3 - why music quality drops with better technology.

A couple of interesting things popped up today about The Loundness War. Firstly this article in Rolling Stone. It’s one of the best I’ve seen on all the issues around overly loud records and how as audio technology evolves, the worse music sounds - and I’m not talking about content or style. As well as covering all the different aspects of the issues around The Loudness Wars - it also details the problems of MP3 with regard to sound quality and how engineers and producers are trying to counteract the negative aspects of this technology. There are also plenty of sonic examples detailing the problems around overly loud records and low rate MP3’s.

For me, one of the interesting things in this article was information about an organization called Turn Me Up! which is attempting to bring The Loudness War to an end. I’ve joined them for certification as a mastering engineer and I also hope to submit records that I produce/mix for certification as well - as long as my clients are up for making their records less loud!

It’s hard to say how effective any “bottom up” campaign will be against overly loud records. Whenever I talk to my clients about this, or discuss it with other people in the music business it would seem that everyone is reluctant to be the among the first to take the “risk” of making a less loud, yet better sounding record. And being a mastering engineer working in a service industry, I have little option other than to deliver what my clients want in order to keep my business afloat. What we need is high profile bands and artists to put out records that are less loud and make a point of doing so. Much like when Radiohead used the release of their In Rainbows LP to promote a new business model - a similar thing could be done for forwarding the idea of quieter and better sounding records. And Radiohead would probably be a great band to do such a thing.

So after writing that, I went over to the forum attached to the Radiohead site and posted this.

Will anything happen?