Archive for the 'opinion' Category

The broken music industry. Why a free anti-piracy DVD for schools won’t work.

This is a website set up by MIPI “an organisation that provides investigative and intellectual property rights enforcement” along with the support of the major music labels & local industry body ARIA. It’s basically a video based on the old shtick where the artists all line up to cry poor about how music piracy is hurting them.

Included are Aussie acts like The Veronicas, who made a $AU 1.7 million profit last year & Human Nature with $AU 1.9 million for their trouble. These numbers come via the BRW Top 50 Entertainers list (subscription needed).

Even more mind-melting is the fact that this will be available on DVD free to high schools and available as a BitTorrent download! (BitTorrent is one place where you can access pirated music on the net.) From The Age newspaper article:

“The documentary is not yet part of a structured anti-piracy program in schools, but Heindl said it was formatted to fit neatly into existing units, such as the “Music for Free?” English unit created this year by the Commonwealth Department of Education, which examines the ethics of file sharing.”

I’m amazed that the artists are willing to line themselves up to peddle this tired crap - but then again if you’ve ever listened to some of these records, you’d know that many of these artists have made a career from recording their toilet activities and setting it to a dope beat with the help of a hot producer. To understand why this is just so much rubbish and how a free DVD of some confused artists won’t do anything to help, come with me now as we zoom out to take a bigger look at what is going on.

Music happened before there was an industry and it will happen after. Music is a timeless human expression that changes and occurs constantly. The ‘industry’ is new to music in this timescale and has sought to exploit a gap between artist and (a new) audience opened by technology. It did/does this in two ways:

Firstly, technology emerged (c.1888) that meant that a recording could be made of a musical performance. New technology is always expensive and subsequently this meant that very few people had the opportunity to record. Over time, many myths have been and continue to be built up about the recording process - most of them bogus. Most music business people have little understanding of this technology, so subsequently they subscribe to these myths (ie. an expensive recording studio is a better recording studio). These myths are handy when artists take them on, as require the continued participation of the music business to finance something that the artist can rarely do themselves.

Secondly, yet more technologies allowed these recordings to be reproduced, distributed and sold to many more people than before. Things like vinyl presses, trucks & trains, radio stations and so on were expensive and the music industry has paid for and subsequently controlled many aspects of the technology/money gap between artist and audience. The music industry belives that it created, paid for and therefore owns this audience - even if they used artists and their work as the front to do so. It’s important to note here that while they may have created an audience they did not create the audience. The audience is a cultural phenomenon. In music, an audience starts with the individual who creates a piece and goes out into the world.

As technology has moved on and closed this gap of its own volition, the music industry failed to see what was happening and is now broken. If some people did see this happening, there was little or nothing that could be done to stop it. Recording technology is cheap and prolific and is a massive industry in its own right. With more access to information (largely via the internet) recording myths are being debunked or becoming so outrageous that they are irrelevant. The recording industry lost this aspect of control about 20 years ago and was the beginning of the end for it. The internet has subsequently filled the distribution, marketing and sales gap once controlled by a few large companies. Without a gap to exploit, there can be and will be no music industry in the centrally controlled mass-market fashion we’ve become accustomed to.

This means that someday soon The Veronicas will be out there in the big wide world with just themselves, their music, some recording gear and a computer - just like the majority of people who make music today. All this film shows is a sad display of artists coming to terms with the fact that the industry they chose to be a part of is broken and without it, making a buck out of music will continue to require them to work hard with most likely, less reward.

So now we have some perspective - here’s a quick list of items for consideration for the crew of the SS. Australian Music Biz as their ship disappears under the waves, never to be see again:

  • Music will still get made, sold and enjoyed even if ARIA and all the major labels collapsed overnight.

  • The day after this happens the members of general public who have yet to ween themselves off commercial radio will realize that there is more music out there than ever before covering more styles, sounds, moods and ideas than you’ll ever have time for.
  • With their feed tube removed, radio stations may have to return to employing DJ’s who know & care about music. This would also mean that it will be easier for more bands to have access to more ears.
  • Music will be purchased directly (or more directly) from the artists, so while they may not sell as much, they’ll make the same, or maybe more money - as this article by Steve Albini demonstrates and also as recent releases by Radiohead and Nine Inch Nails indicate.
  • Performing will return as essential to any music career. Industry-made studio-built bands will get less attention without a show or a publicity machine.
  • Less cash and public prominence will lower the risk of artists developing fevered egos and becoming culturally disconnected and irrelevant. Bono and Sting will return to their true place in the world as “a couple of guys from those two bands”.
  • With less money recording will be stripped back to it’s essentials (a good recording of a good performance) as no one will be able to afford spending excessive time in the studio polishing turds.

Please big music industry, go someplace quiet and die to let the rest of us get on with making music for each other. We don’t need you anymore and we’re sorry you didn’t realise that you couldn’t own music. It’s a shame to have to watch you pass away without dignity - but this is the fate suffered by many a cheat. It’s not nice to think about all the artists you exploited and the ill fate that many suffered but we’ll recycle what’s left of you (and your market) to make something new. We promise to think of you when we play our copies Back In Black that we downloaded on our computers and remember the times when people “made records like that”.

The relevance of Art

The video below shows an experiment where,

Klara.be did an experiment with (Danish painter) Luc Tuymans. What if you take art out of its usual context and expose it in the street?”.

It’s interesting little film with a result that was to me, unsurprising.

Does this video make a joke out of all of the curators and exhibitors who wax lyrical about Tuymans work? This was what struck me when I watched it the first time through, but the narration @ 6:42 was what really made me think twice;

“Hopefully, these numbers will wake people up. Can experiments like this one, help people to take more interest in art?”

This video sets out to do something interesting, yet fails due to its non-critical bias of the work of art chosen for the experiment. Most experiments would use a variety of tests to prove the hypothesis. Would the same thing happen to different artists? To video art? Sculpture? A sound installation? Something that interacts with the people passing by?

As much as this video attempts to convince us that people on the street lack an appreciation of great art, it also shows that the contemporary art world is blind to its own self righteous opinions. Could it be that regardless of the talk and the money surrounding Tuymans work, in the end it may not really be as good as the art world says it is? It could be said that for 96% of the people that walked past, Tuymans painting lacks the power to draw people to it and hold them in its expression? Maybe the narration could have read,

“Hopefully, these numbers will wake the contemporary art world up. Can experiments like this one, help the art elite to take more interest in the world.”

Quality audio cables = quality audio bulls**t.

You know, boingboing is such a great blog. A lot of stuff I post here comes via bb and I’m seriously thinking that I should just rename my site thecoolaudioandmusicstufffromboingboingrepostingblog.com.

Anyhow…

Does more expensive cable sound better?
A guy does a blind test with his buddies between expensive, hyped, flashy Monster Cable and a couple of coat hangers. They discover that the sophisticated and complex work of audiophiledom that they once inhabited has suddenly become a room full of marketing exec’s yelling at them:

I’m so sorry, but I do not buy into 90% of the hype brought to us audiophiles by the commercial sector of our hobby and the home entertainment industry at large. My brother, an audio engineering whiz kid has proven to me what is real and what is not. Let me rehearse with you an example of how he does this.

We gathered up a 5 of our audio buddies. We took my “old” Martin Logan SL-3 (not a bad speaker for accurate noise making) and hooked them up with Monster 1000 speaker cables (decent cables according to the audio press). We also rigged up 14 gauge, oxygen free Belden stranded copper wire with a simple PVC jacket. Both were 2 meters long. They were connected to an ABX switch box allowing blind fold testing. Volume levels were set at 75 Db at 1000K Hz. A high quality recording of smooth, trio, easy listening jazz was played (Piano, drums, bass). None of us had heard this group or CD before, therefore eliminating biases. The music was played. Of the 5 blind folded, only 2 guessed correctly which was the monster cable. (I was not one of them). This was done 7 times in a row! Keeping us blind folded, my brother switched out the Belden wire (are you ready for this) with simple coat hanger wire! Unknown to me and our 12 audiophile buddies, prior to the ABX blind test, he took apart four coat hangers, reconnectd them and twisted them into a pair of speaker cables. Connections were soldered. He stashed them in a closet within the testing room so we were not privy to what he was up to. This made for a pair of 2 meter cables, the exact length of the other wires. The test was conducted. After 5 tests, none could determine which was the Monster 1000 cable or the coat hanger wire. Further, when music was played through the coat hanger wire, we were asked if what we heard sounded good to us. All agreed that what was heard sounded excellent, however, when A-B tests occured, it was impossible to determine which sounded best the majority of the time and which wire was in use. Needless to say, after the blind folds came off and we saw what my brother did, we learned he was right…most of what manufactures have to say about their products is pure hype. It seems the more they charge, the more hyped it is.

via audioholics.com
via consumerist
via boingboing
- yeah!

Why records DO all sound the same | Word Magazine

Another great article today from Word Magazine on the state of making records and all the issues involved, from sound quality to making hits. This article was written by Tom Whitwell who also maintains the awesome Music Thing blog.

Why records DO all sound the same | Word Magazine

“Why does most music sound the same these days? Because record companies are scared, they don’t want to take risks, and they’re doing the best they can to generate mainstream radio hits. That is their job, after all. And as the skies continue to darken over the poor benighted business of selling music, labels are going to cling to what they know more fiercely than ever.”

(Via Music Thing.)

Picture of Jack Joseph Puig in his studio.

What does a $6 million dollar home theatre look like?

So what happens when you send $6 million on a home cinema?

This happens….

Full article here.
(via Audio Video Interiors)

Things I would expect from this home cinema:

  • for all men to instantly show me a deep and lasting respect
  • at least a 3 to 5 inch extension in both length and girth
  • to have my pick of the women and,
    • get instantly rigid

    • go the distance
    • go repeatedly
  • to make lightning bolts come out of my finger tips and have a god-like presence where ever I go
  • to both be able to both see and hear individual sperm in porno cum-shots
  • to know more about music & cinema than any other living human
  • to know more about hi-fi, audio and electronics than anyone within 3.5 light-years of the solar system
  • to hear some “killer, phat” bass
  • for The Carpenters Greatest Hits to sound pretty good, particularly “Calling Occupants…
  • for a constant stream of male audiophiles to be paying me a visit
  • for a constant stream of male audiophiles to be using my bathroom in an inappropriate manner
  • for other men to speak of me in hushed tones when they see my stride purposefully round the floor at any hi-fi trade show
  • to ensure that each individual viewing of “An Inconvenient Truth” burns more CO2 than it took to make the film itself.
  • to put on a film like Transformers and initially be overwhelmed, then kinda bored and finally depressed at how most of the films I’m watching are really pretty shithouse.
  • to budget into the room costing an allowance for therapy for reassurance that, what with the state of the world and all, it’s still okay to drop $6 million on a home cinema.
    and the ones that are good really don’t need any of this gear.

  • to find enlightenment watching the death/dream sequence at the end of Kubrick’s 2001

I’m sure there are more things within the reach of this home cinema but, you know, I have a life to get back to. If you want more however - check out the guy with the biggest home subs I’ve ever seen. Considering the subs plus the various shades of brown in this guys room, the word anal has new, um.. resonance? The design of the site itself is enough to tell you that this guys sense of taste up and left when he bought that 1st copy of Neil Sedaka’s Calendar Girl when he was 13.

Great stuff about SONY/BMG’s MusicPass scheme/scam

My mate Jon, put me onto this great post from John Scalzi’s Whatever blog. Killer stuff.

Sony BMG spokesperson: We’re pleased to announce we are the final major music corporation to release electronic tracks without that pesky DRM! All you have to do is leave your house, go to a selected retail outlet, buy a special card there, go back to your house, scratch off the back of the card to find a code, go to our special MusicPass Web site, enter said code, and download one the 37 titles we have available, from Celine Dion to the Backstreet Boys!

Kid #1: Or, in the time it takes me to jump through all those hoops, I could just download all 37 of those albums off of Pirate Bay.

Kid #2: Or, I could just scratch off the back at the store, record the pin number, go home and download the album through a Tor connection, so you can’t trace my IP number.

Kid #1: Also, what’s with this first slate of artists? Celine Dion? Backstreet Boys? Kenny Chesney? Barry Manilow? Are you high?

Sony BMG dude: They appeal to the sort of mainstream consumer who will see the convenience of our revolutionary music cards!

Kid #2: Like my mom? Dude, she’s not going to buy a card. She’s going to buy a CD. Because she’s at the CD store. Where she can buy CDs.

Sony BMG dude: They also make lovely gifts!

Kid #1: If she gets one as a gift, all she’s going to do is ask me how the heck she’s supposed to use it. And then she’s going ask me to get the download for her. Like I’m not busy. And you know what I’m going to do? I’m going to return the card for cash, and then I’m going to download the album off of Pirate Bay, because you’ve confused and upset my mom. And annoyed me.

Sony BMG dude: Uh.

Kid #2: So to recap, what you’ve got here is a system that makes people leave their house in order to download music at their house, and makes them go to a store to get music that they could get at the store, somewhere else.

Sony BMG dude: Er.

Kid #1: Why don’t you just sell non-DRM’d MP3s off Amazon, like every other major music corporation?

Sony BMG dude: Well.

Kid #2: You don’t actually want to sell unprotected MP3s, do you? You want to be able to say you’re doing it, but really, you want to make it so ridiculously inconvenient that people keep just keep buying CDs and DRM’d tracks off iTunes. Just admit it, bro.

Sony BMG dude (pointing): Look! It’s Celine Dion! And Barry Manilow! (runs away as kids avert their eyes in terror)

Poor, stupid deluded Sony BMG.

This MusicPass thing: six months at the outside.

Jon also sent me this gold - Vinyl Sleeve Heads

The Loudness War & mixing for MP3 - why music quality drops with better technology.

A couple of interesting things popped up today about The Loundness War. Firstly this article in Rolling Stone. It’s one of the best I’ve seen on all the issues around overly loud records and how as audio technology evolves, the worse music sounds - and I’m not talking about content or style. As well as covering all the different aspects of the issues around The Loudness Wars - it also details the problems of MP3 with regard to sound quality and how engineers and producers are trying to counteract the negative aspects of this technology. There are also plenty of sonic examples detailing the problems around overly loud records and low rate MP3’s.

For me, one of the interesting things in this article was information about an organization called Turn Me Up! which is attempting to bring The Loudness War to an end. I’ve joined them for certification as a mastering engineer and I also hope to submit records that I produce/mix for certification as well - as long as my clients are up for making their records less loud!

It’s hard to say how effective any “bottom up” campaign will be against overly loud records. Whenever I talk to my clients about this, or discuss it with other people in the music business it would seem that everyone is reluctant to be the among the first to take the “risk” of making a less loud, yet better sounding record. And being a mastering engineer working in a service industry, I have little option other than to deliver what my clients want in order to keep my business afloat. What we need is high profile bands and artists to put out records that are less loud and make a point of doing so. Much like when Radiohead used the release of their In Rainbows LP to promote a new business model - a similar thing could be done for forwarding the idea of quieter and better sounding records. And Radiohead would probably be a great band to do such a thing.

So after writing that, I went over to the forum attached to the Radiohead site and posted this.

Will anything happen?