Archive for the 'the biznez' Category

The broken music industry. Why a free anti-piracy DVD for schools won’t work.

This is a website set up by MIPI “an organisation that provides investigative and intellectual property rights enforcement” along with the support of the major music labels & local industry body ARIA. It’s basically a video based on the old shtick where the artists all line up to cry poor about how music piracy is hurting them.

Included are Aussie acts like The Veronicas, who made a $AU 1.7 million profit last year & Human Nature with $AU 1.9 million for their trouble. These numbers come via the BRW Top 50 Entertainers list (subscription needed).

Even more mind-melting is the fact that this will be available on DVD free to high schools and available as a BitTorrent download! (BitTorrent is one place where you can access pirated music on the net.) From The Age newspaper article:

“The documentary is not yet part of a structured anti-piracy program in schools, but Heindl said it was formatted to fit neatly into existing units, such as the “Music for Free?” English unit created this year by the Commonwealth Department of Education, which examines the ethics of file sharing.”

I’m amazed that the artists are willing to line themselves up to peddle this tired crap - but then again if you’ve ever listened to some of these records, you’d know that many of these artists have made a career from recording their toilet activities and setting it to a dope beat with the help of a hot producer. To understand why this is just so much rubbish and how a free DVD of some confused artists won’t do anything to help, come with me now as we zoom out to take a bigger look at what is going on.

Music happened before there was an industry and it will happen after. Music is a timeless human expression that changes and occurs constantly. The ‘industry’ is new to music in this timescale and has sought to exploit a gap between artist and (a new) audience opened by technology. It did/does this in two ways:

Firstly, technology emerged (c.1888) that meant that a recording could be made of a musical performance. New technology is always expensive and subsequently this meant that very few people had the opportunity to record. Over time, many myths have been and continue to be built up about the recording process - most of them bogus. Most music business people have little understanding of this technology, so subsequently they subscribe to these myths (ie. an expensive recording studio is a better recording studio). These myths are handy when artists take them on, as require the continued participation of the music business to finance something that the artist can rarely do themselves.

Secondly, yet more technologies allowed these recordings to be reproduced, distributed and sold to many more people than before. Things like vinyl presses, trucks & trains, radio stations and so on were expensive and the music industry has paid for and subsequently controlled many aspects of the technology/money gap between artist and audience. The music industry belives that it created, paid for and therefore owns this audience - even if they used artists and their work as the front to do so. It’s important to note here that while they may have created an audience they did not create the audience. The audience is a cultural phenomenon. In music, an audience starts with the individual who creates a piece and goes out into the world.

As technology has moved on and closed this gap of its own volition, the music industry failed to see what was happening and is now broken. If some people did see this happening, there was little or nothing that could be done to stop it. Recording technology is cheap and prolific and is a massive industry in its own right. With more access to information (largely via the internet) recording myths are being debunked or becoming so outrageous that they are irrelevant. The recording industry lost this aspect of control about 20 years ago and was the beginning of the end for it. The internet has subsequently filled the distribution, marketing and sales gap once controlled by a few large companies. Without a gap to exploit, there can be and will be no music industry in the centrally controlled mass-market fashion we’ve become accustomed to.

This means that someday soon The Veronicas will be out there in the big wide world with just themselves, their music, some recording gear and a computer - just like the majority of people who make music today. All this film shows is a sad display of artists coming to terms with the fact that the industry they chose to be a part of is broken and without it, making a buck out of music will continue to require them to work hard with most likely, less reward.

So now we have some perspective - here’s a quick list of items for consideration for the crew of the SS. Australian Music Biz as their ship disappears under the waves, never to be see again:

  • Music will still get made, sold and enjoyed even if ARIA and all the major labels collapsed overnight.

  • The day after this happens the members of general public who have yet to ween themselves off commercial radio will realize that there is more music out there than ever before covering more styles, sounds, moods and ideas than you’ll ever have time for.
  • With their feed tube removed, radio stations may have to return to employing DJ’s who know & care about music. This would also mean that it will be easier for more bands to have access to more ears.
  • Music will be purchased directly (or more directly) from the artists, so while they may not sell as much, they’ll make the same, or maybe more money - as this article by Steve Albini demonstrates and also as recent releases by Radiohead and Nine Inch Nails indicate.
  • Performing will return as essential to any music career. Industry-made studio-built bands will get less attention without a show or a publicity machine.
  • Less cash and public prominence will lower the risk of artists developing fevered egos and becoming culturally disconnected and irrelevant. Bono and Sting will return to their true place in the world as “a couple of guys from those two bands”.
  • With less money recording will be stripped back to it’s essentials (a good recording of a good performance) as no one will be able to afford spending excessive time in the studio polishing turds.

Please big music industry, go someplace quiet and die to let the rest of us get on with making music for each other. We don’t need you anymore and we’re sorry you didn’t realise that you couldn’t own music. It’s a shame to have to watch you pass away without dignity - but this is the fate suffered by many a cheat. It’s not nice to think about all the artists you exploited and the ill fate that many suffered but we’ll recycle what’s left of you (and your market) to make something new. We promise to think of you when we play our copies Back In Black that we downloaded on our computers and remember the times when people “made records like that”.

Great stuff about SONY/BMG’s MusicPass scheme/scam

My mate Jon, put me onto this great post from John Scalzi’s Whatever blog. Killer stuff.

Sony BMG spokesperson: We’re pleased to announce we are the final major music corporation to release electronic tracks without that pesky DRM! All you have to do is leave your house, go to a selected retail outlet, buy a special card there, go back to your house, scratch off the back of the card to find a code, go to our special MusicPass Web site, enter said code, and download one the 37 titles we have available, from Celine Dion to the Backstreet Boys!

Kid #1: Or, in the time it takes me to jump through all those hoops, I could just download all 37 of those albums off of Pirate Bay.

Kid #2: Or, I could just scratch off the back at the store, record the pin number, go home and download the album through a Tor connection, so you can’t trace my IP number.

Kid #1: Also, what’s with this first slate of artists? Celine Dion? Backstreet Boys? Kenny Chesney? Barry Manilow? Are you high?

Sony BMG dude: They appeal to the sort of mainstream consumer who will see the convenience of our revolutionary music cards!

Kid #2: Like my mom? Dude, she’s not going to buy a card. She’s going to buy a CD. Because she’s at the CD store. Where she can buy CDs.

Sony BMG dude: They also make lovely gifts!

Kid #1: If she gets one as a gift, all she’s going to do is ask me how the heck she’s supposed to use it. And then she’s going ask me to get the download for her. Like I’m not busy. And you know what I’m going to do? I’m going to return the card for cash, and then I’m going to download the album off of Pirate Bay, because you’ve confused and upset my mom. And annoyed me.

Sony BMG dude: Uh.

Kid #2: So to recap, what you’ve got here is a system that makes people leave their house in order to download music at their house, and makes them go to a store to get music that they could get at the store, somewhere else.

Sony BMG dude: Er.

Kid #1: Why don’t you just sell non-DRM’d MP3s off Amazon, like every other major music corporation?

Sony BMG dude: Well.

Kid #2: You don’t actually want to sell unprotected MP3s, do you? You want to be able to say you’re doing it, but really, you want to make it so ridiculously inconvenient that people keep just keep buying CDs and DRM’d tracks off iTunes. Just admit it, bro.

Sony BMG dude (pointing): Look! It’s Celine Dion! And Barry Manilow! (runs away as kids avert their eyes in terror)

Poor, stupid deluded Sony BMG.

This MusicPass thing: six months at the outside.

Jon also sent me this gold - Vinyl Sleeve Heads

The Loudness War & mixing for MP3 - why music quality drops with better technology.

A couple of interesting things popped up today about The Loundness War. Firstly this article in Rolling Stone. It’s one of the best I’ve seen on all the issues around overly loud records and how as audio technology evolves, the worse music sounds - and I’m not talking about content or style. As well as covering all the different aspects of the issues around The Loudness Wars - it also details the problems of MP3 with regard to sound quality and how engineers and producers are trying to counteract the negative aspects of this technology. There are also plenty of sonic examples detailing the problems around overly loud records and low rate MP3’s.

For me, one of the interesting things in this article was information about an organization called Turn Me Up! which is attempting to bring The Loudness War to an end. I’ve joined them for certification as a mastering engineer and I also hope to submit records that I produce/mix for certification as well - as long as my clients are up for making their records less loud!

It’s hard to say how effective any “bottom up” campaign will be against overly loud records. Whenever I talk to my clients about this, or discuss it with other people in the music business it would seem that everyone is reluctant to be the among the first to take the “risk” of making a less loud, yet better sounding record. And being a mastering engineer working in a service industry, I have little option other than to deliver what my clients want in order to keep my business afloat. What we need is high profile bands and artists to put out records that are less loud and make a point of doing so. Much like when Radiohead used the release of their In Rainbows LP to promote a new business model - a similar thing could be done for forwarding the idea of quieter and better sounding records. And Radiohead would probably be a great band to do such a thing.

So after writing that, I went over to the forum attached to the Radiohead site and posted this.

Will anything happen?

David Byrne on the changing face of the music business.

Reading boingboing the other day I saw a post to this article in Wired by David Byrne. It’s a killer article detailing the current spread of music business models out there. There are also a bunch of audio files on the page where David interviews Thom Yorke and Brian Eno among others.

There is no one single way of doing business these days. There are, in fact, six viable models by my count. That variety is good for artists; it gives them more ways to get paid and make a living. And it’s good for audiences, too, who will have more — and more interesting — music to listen to.

Pure Synth Vocals - The Future Of Pop Music

Did any of you read Idoru by William Gibson? You should.

In this book Mr. Gibson lays down the idea that our future pop stars will be purely synthetic creations. When you look at the current state of pop music in it’s totality it seems perverse that we should subject humans to all that expensive surgery, studio magic and photoshop re-touching to get the latest variation on ‘perfection’. After their moment passes it would seem we end up with severely broken humans like Michael Jackson or Britney Spears. As the famous flesh human ages, a dark battle rages inside these fading stars that appears on their faces and bodies - take a look at the vast swathes of ‘legends’ as they slide up the red carpet - it’s a god-damn horror show. They appear like Sam Lowry’s surgery addicted mother Ida, in the film Brazil, usually more bronzed than Han Solo encased in carbonite. Unlike Han however, their attempts at suspended animation are somewhat less successful.

Editorialization aside, Vocaloid 2 is a piece of software from Yamaha that let your create a synthetic vocal track just by entering lyrics and the melody into the software. It costs about AUD$165.00. Have a listen to the file below for a demo. It would appear that we’re now one step closer to our idoru pop-stars of the future. Let’s stop this madness of trying to make the flesh and grey-matter bend to the will of 14 year old girls and half-witted fashion crazed A&R douches.

via HobbyBlog, via BoingBoing

Fake Steve takes it to the bridge

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Fake Steve Jobs at his finest. This is the most succinct thing I’ve read on the music biz in ages.

The music industry nobs have finally figured out what we’re doing: “So you’ve no doubt seen this story or one like it explaining that Universal Music Group won’t renew its iTunes deal. And you’ve seen people saying that the majors are trying to ‘recalibrate’ their relationships with us. Actually what’s happening is they’re crapping in their pants. They woke up one day and realized that we’ve got 80% share of digital downloads. Suddenly all the power in the value chain resides in one player. Oops.

Here’s the thing. These guys could have done what we did. If you’ll recall, in the early days of the Internet, that’s what everyone figured was going to happen. The majors would build digital distribution arms. But they didn’t do it, because they didn’t understand technology, and they didn’t want to invest in building this expertise, and they were freaked out about piracy and paralyzed with fear. So we stepped in. We invested in people. We developed software that’s easy to use and works flawlessly. (And if you think that’s trivial, think again. It’s huge.) We promoted it, we marketed it, we haggled with all the majors and struck deals. We took all the risk. And yeah, now we’re reaping the reward. And guess what. The majors want a bigger slice. Um, for what? We did all the work. Ain’t gonna happen, slick.

Here’s the back story. The music companies are in a dying business, and they know it. Sure, they act all cool because they hang around with rock stars. But beneath all the glamour these guys are actually operating two very low-tech businesses. One is a form of loan-sharking: They put up money to make records, and then they force recording artists to pay the money back with exorbitant interest. The other business is distribution. They’ve got big warehouses and they control the shipment of little plastic boxes that happen to have music in them. We’ve seen what the Internet has done to brick-and-mortar retailers. Next to go are the brick-and-mortar warehouses. The guys running the labels are pretty stupid — most are just dirtbags who started out as band managers or promoters — but they’ve now figured this out, and they are fighting like cornered rats.

The labels are finally sort of vaguely getting clued in to the fact that in this value chain the power resides not with the creator of the product but with the distributor — and that by letting us make the online music store they’ve taken themselves out of the distribution business. In the world of digital, the distributor is Apple. We’re also the retailer. And the marketer. Another way to see this value chain: Think of the kids in China who make iPods. In the music industry value chain, the artists are the equivalent of those kids. And the labels are the equivalent of the Chinese companies that employ those kids. (Not a perfect analogy, I realize. But it’s kinda sorta how things are.)

In the days of vinyl and then CDs, the labels managed to hold on to a larger share of the power in the value chain by having loads of retailers in a highly fragmented market, and playing them off each other. In the digital world they’ve got us. And that’s it.

Ironically the mistake the major labels made was the same one that IBM made when it gave the DOS franchise to Microsoft nearly 30 years ago. They had a piece of work that they couldn’t do on their own or didn’t want to do on their own and they didn’t view it as critical or important so they outsourced it to a partner. (’Go make us an online music store.’) The partner turned that seemingly unimportant work into a way to accrue power and create a monopoly and control the industry. Today in the music business we’re about where IBM and Microsoft were in 1989, when IBM finally got hit with the clue stick and realized what Microsoft was doing.

How will it play out this time? I don’t know, honestly. But I like our chances.”

(Via The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs.)